caprops.org · All 14 California propositions · One-page cheat sheet

Prop 3: High-Income Tax Extension

California ballot, November 3, 2026: what it does, who's paying, and why

Money raised
Yes $77.4M No $0 as of October 27, 20261
Party positions
Democrats YES Republicans NO2,3,4
Cost / income (approx.)
+$10B/yr5
Special interest
Yes side: Medium · No side: None
Worth knowing
Teachers' unions put up nearly all the money1
On the November 3 Ballot

Prop 3: High-Income Tax Extension

Makes the 2012 tax on top earners permanent

Who paid to put it on the ballot California Teachers Association, through a petition drive.

History Only voters can extend it. It's in the state constitution: voters approved it in 2012 (Prop 30) and extended it in 2016 (Prop 55).6

A YES vote means
The income tax increase on high earners, in place since 2012, would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.7
A NO vote means
The tax increase would expire in 2031 as scheduled.7
Yes side $77.4M No side $0 Who gains, who pays
Who it helps if it passes
  • K–12 schools and community colleges, which get most of the money
  • Public health care, which gets any excess
Who pays or loses if it passes
  • People earning more than about $371,000 a year, roughly the top 2% of tax filers. No one else's taxes change.
What the funders get Teachers' unions paid for nearly all of it. Most of the money goes to school budgets, which pay their members' salaries.1

Cost to taxpayers No new tax. It keeps $5 billion to $15 billion a year in state revenue that would otherwise end after 2031.7

Makes permanent a tax on high-income earners that is set to expire in 2031. Rates run from 10.3% to 12.3% on individual income above about $371,000.7

About 89% of the money goes to K–12 schools and 11% to community colleges, with any excess going to public health care. If it fails, the tax expires in 2031 as scheduled.7

YES side special interest: Medium
  • ✓ One funder dominates: California Teachers Association paid 77% of the YES money1
  • ✓ Funders profit: Teachers' unions; the money funds the schools that employ their members (our judgment)
  • ✗ Narrow benefit: Schools and colleges statewide (our judgment)
  • ✗ Outside money: 11% of the YES money came from outside California1
NO side special interest: None
  • ✗ One funder dominates: No major funders1
  • ✗ Funders profit: No major funders1
  • ✗ Narrow benefit: No major funders1
  • ✗ Outside money: No major funders1
Endorsed by
Funding the YES campaign
$77.4M1
  • $60.0M
  • National Education Association
    $7.5M
    National teachers' union, Washington, D.C.
  • California School Employees Association
    $2.6M
  • California Federation of Teachers
    $1.8M
  • SEIU California State Council
    $1.5M
  • SEIU Local 2015
    $1M
  • AFSCME and American Federation of Teachers (national)
    $950K
    National unions, Washington, D.C.
  • United Domestic Workers of America
    $852K
  • California Democratic Party
    $798K
  • California Professional Firefighters
    $500K
Funding the NO campaign
$0

No committee has raised $1M or more. That is the state's threshold for reporting top donors.

Sources for this measure: 1,6,7,8

Sources

  1. FPPC, Top 10 contributors, November 2026 General Election (data as of Oct 27, 2026)
  2. California Democratic Party, 2026 Proposition Endorsements (PDF)
  3. California Republican Party, 2026 Endorsements
  4. CalMatters, 2026 voter guide (party positions per measure)
  5. Official voter guide (CA Secretary of State), Quick Reference Guide: fiscal impact estimates by the Legislative Analyst
  6. Wikipedia, 2016 California Proposition 55
  7. Official voter guide (CA Secretary of State), Prop 3 quick reference
  8. CalMatters voter guide